Que Sera, Sera

An English film song clip is circulating repeatedly on WhatsApp during the last one week. In popular language of today's times, it has gone viral. The song in question is "Que Sera, Sera", a song from the 1956 Hollywood English mystery thriller film "The Man Who Knew Too Much", produced and directed by Alfred Hitchcock. Sung and acted in the film by the famous singing actress of yesteryears, Doris Day, it runs like this:

When I was just a little girl
I asked my mother what I will be
Will I be pretty?, Will I be rich?
Here's what she said to me:

Que Sera, Sera
Whatever will be, will be
The future is not ours to see
Que Sera, Sera
What will be, will be!

The song continues in two more stanzas. The little girl grows up and asks her sweetheart the same question when she fell in love. She gets the same answer. Some years after her marriage, her son asks her the same question. Of course, her answer now will be the same!

The Youtube link to the song is given at the end of this blog post, for you to click on it and listen.

When we dwell upon the theme of the song in the Indian context, it makes very interesting reading indeed, as we see below.

******

Alfred Hitchcock (1899-1980) is known for his suspense thrillers. There is hardly anyone who has not seen his movies. His film career covered a large span of time, covering early silent films, black and white film times to modren times. He has directed over 50 films. He also was host of the popular television shows like "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" and "Alfred Hitchcock Hour", which are seen even today worldwide. 

Hitchcock's suspense was basically derived from the light and sound effects, even when there was not much horror scenes on the screen. The tension would build in the mind of the viewer, not due to what he saw but what he perceived. He was knighted and later became Sir Alfred Hitchcock. 

Hitchcock first produced and directed the movie "The man who knew too much" in the year 1934. More than twenty years later, he remade the film with some modifications, but the same name in 1956. James Stewart and Doris Day played the lead roles in the 1956 film that has this song, which has now gone viral.

******

During the years when sound recording and background music and singing integration had not yet reached the perfect levels, singing artistes were in great demand and very popular. There were many stalwarts in Hollywood and other parts of the world as well, who were great singers in their own right, who did very well as film artistes. Artistes like Frank Sinatra, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley and Barbara Streisand are some such names. Doris Day is another such illustrious name and she was on the screen some ten years before another similar artiste, Julie Andrews of Sound of Music fame. 

In India also, we had our own great singing artistes. In North India, we had Kundan Lal Saigal, Pankaj Mallick, Suraiyya, Noor Jehan and others. Kishore Kumar was active for a long time and till much later times. In South India we had the legendary M K Thyagaraja Bhagavatar, P Bhanumati (later Bhanumati Ramakrishna) and many others. In Kannada, Honnappa Bhagavatar was one such well known name. There were many others as well, who had short stints. 

Doris Day (1922-2019) had her great singing career as well as appearance in films on either side of World War II. She won innumerable awards in her long career and lived a full life of 97 years. This song Que Sera Sera won the Oscar for "Best Original Song". She was also honoured with an Oscar for her Life time achievements. 

Her star can be seen on "Hollywood Walk of Fame" in Los Angeles, USA. In "The Butchart Gardens" in Victoria Island, Canada (near Vancouver), a special rose plant is dedicated to Doris Day. 

Doris played the role of Josephine Conway McKenna (Jo Conway) in the film "The man who knew too much" opposite James Stewart, who played as husband Dr Benjamin McKenna (Ben McKenna). The song was used twice in the movie, the second time to help trace their kidnapped son Hank. 

******

What is the origin of the phrase "Que Sera, Sera"? some sources say it is Spanish while some others say it is Italian. Some say it is a hybrid term. It is not an English phrase. But it is used to mean "Whatever will be, will be" in English. What is its equivalent for us? If we look to Sanskrit, it translates to "भवितव्यम् भवत्येव" (Bhavitavyam Bhavatyeva). In essence, it means "Future is not in your control. Don't worry about. Whatever is to happen, it will happen".

Where can we find this term in our literature? There is a Subashita in "Maha Subhashita Sangraha" (Shloka 4,901), which in turn has been picked up from "Samskrita Sookti Ratnakara", compiled by Sri Ramji Upadhyaya. It reads thus:

आपत्सु किं विषादेन सम्पत्तौ विस्मयेन किम् 

भवितव्यं भवत्येव कर्मणामेष निश्चयः 

Aapatsu kim vishadena sampattou vismayena kim

Bhavitavyam bhavatyeva karmanamesha nischayaha 

"Why feel sad in adversity and elated in times of affluence? Whatever is to happen, will happen! It is decided by previous karma. Do your duty and leave the rest to the future".

******

The roots for this Subhashita can be found in Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, Shloka 12.219.10. This is the part in which Bheeshma, while lying on the bed of arrows, condenses his lifetime acquired knowledge and teaches Yudhishtira, as per the instructions of Krishna. 

It reads thus:

यथा यथास्य प्राप्तव्यं प्रप्नेत्यैव तथा तथा 
भवितव्यं यथा यच्च भवत्येव तथा तथा 

Yathaa yathaachha praptavyam prapnetyaiva tathaa tathaa
bhavitavyam yathaa yaccha bhavatyeva tathaa tathaa  

"Just as one is destined to obtain something, one obtains it precisely in that manner. And whatever is destined to occur, it occurs precisely in that manner"

******

Que Sera, Sera is not new to us. It is a teaching that is several thousand years old. As the future is not in our control, it is not something to be worried about. Do your duty and leave the rest to future itself. This is not just a lesson. it is our philosophy of life!

The song "Que Sera Sera" can be heard by clicking on the video given below:

The future is safe

Vijay Merchant is a name that may not be known to today's younger generation. Vijay Madhavji Merchant nee Vijay Madhavji Thakersey was born in the rich family that owned the Thakersey group of textile mills.  He is even today considered as one of the best opening batsman in Cricket that India has ever produced, notwithstanding the well-known exploits of illustrious names like Sunil Gavaskar and Virender Sehwag.  He may be a dwarf in terms of statistics, for a generation that knows players who have played more than 150 Test matches.  In a career spanning 18 years between 1933-1951, he played only 10 test matches.  All of them were against England and he scored only 859 runs with three centuries at an average of 47.72.  His best years of cricket were consumed by World War II.  His first class record is excellent; with an average of 71.64 it was second only to Sir Don Bradman.  In 47 Ranji Trophy matches he averaged 98.75, which is again a Bradman-like average.  He played in an era of uncovered pitches unlike today and yet had the capacity to work for his runs.  His sound technique, wonderful temperament and powers of concentration for long tenures at the crease won him many admirers.  He was the oldest cricketer to score a century at 40 years, a masterful 154 against England in his last test in 1952.  When he retired after that match, press reporters asked him why he had retired when still in good form.  He replied, "It is better to retire when you ask why, rather than when you ask why not"! He was admired by his English opponents to such an extent that C B Fry is reported to have said, "Let us paint him white and take him with us to the Australian tour as our opening batsman".

Vijay Merchant was also a great human being.  He refused to go on the England tour in 1932 since many leaders of the freedom movement, including Mahatma Gandhi, were jailed at that time.  He went as a member of the team in the next series in 1936 as the jailed leaders were released by then. He raised funds for the families of his team mates who died young.  He worked for the cause of handicapped persons. Above all, he was forward looking and believed in the next generation.  He is better known for his "casting vote" as Chairman of the selection committee in its meeting of 1970 when he voted for Ajit Wadekar as the captain of the team in place of Nawab of Pataudi, Mansoor Ali Khan.  There are many versions of this episode, but the ultimate result was that a new leader was given charge. The new captain and emergence of Gavaskar, G R Viswanath and others ensured victories for the team in West indies and England.

What is the relevance of Vijay Merchant now?  There was a debate competition last week on a subject relating to Banking Industry.  The topic of the debate was "The future of Banking Industry is not safe in the hands of the next generation". The debate itself was conducted in a novel way; the participants did not know whether they were speaking for the subject or against it till the start of the debate. Participants on both sides presented deep and well analyzed arguments.  Among the forceful points for the subject were the following:

• The new generation has no patience; they lack discipline and look for quick promotions and higher earnings.
• Their morals and ethics are questionable.
• They are not taking up banking job because they love it; they have come here because they did not get any other job.
• Even while working in the industry, they are looking for greener pastures elsewhere.
• They are too inexperienced to handle higher and more responsible jobs in the industry.
• They lack dedication and commitment to serve the deprived sections of the society.

Equally forceful arguments were presented by the other side.  Some of them were:

• You show patience when you cannot do anything worthwhile; Action is required now and not patience and waiting.
• Working in the industry teaches moral values and ethics.  Let us not be pre-judged.
• Youngsters look for available jobs.  What is wrong with it?
• There is nothing wrong in looking for better jobs or higher remuneration. Times have now changed.  Age old rules cannot be applied today.
• Experience comes by working and learning.  Today's generation learns faster than the earlier generation.
• Dedication and commitment to serve is a matter of policy and driven by the society. Let them be given the opportunity first.

Another important issue was "Use and assimilation of technology".  There was near unanimity on this aspect and the feeling was that the next generation will handle this part better than the previous one.

A similar debate was going on forty years ago.  That such a debate did take place in many places at that time is not well known because media was not this active and sharing of information was slow and of low key.  Even at that time, old timers felt that the new generation was unable to handle the needs of industry. They anticipated turbulent times for the industry after nationalization.  The challenges were no doubt plenty, but the next generation met them squarely and boldly.  They changed the very complexion of banking. The funny thing is, that very generation is now raising the same question about their next generation! 

This reminds me a story that I read some thirty years ago.  A Post Master in a Head Post Office was due for retirement.  He was very much concerned about the working of the post office after his retirement.  He prepared a detailed chart for each one of his key subordinates on the tasks to be done.  On the last day of his stay at office, he handed over the lists to each of them and repeatedly told them about the importance of those tasks. They assured him that they will take care of them and he need not worry.  After the farewell function he went home but could not sleep. He was worried what would happen to the post office next day when he was not there. He got up early, had his quick breakfast and went to the office as usual on the next day morning.  He was greeted by some and others were too busy.  He sat on a chair outside the counter and observed the office till evening.  Things seemed to be going fine.  He repeated this for the next two days.  On the third day, nobody even noticed his presence.  Post office was was working as usual.  He was neither missed inside the office nor was his presence on the outside felt.  He realized his folly and returned home from the Post Office, for one last time.

Old order has to change and make way for the new. This should happen at regular intervals. There is no use in worrying about the capacity of the next generation to manage the change.  As they say, "Time and tide wait for none". 

During the last years of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru's tenure as Prime Minister, there was a lot of speculation about the next leader of the country.  "After Nehru, who?" was a very big question and was hotly debated.  A few months before his death, Pandit Nehru arrived in Bangalore airport.  Press reporters asked him the same question.  "After Nehru, who?".  Pandit Nehru smiled and replied, "Do not worry about it.  The genius of India will find its leader". 

We can also be assured that the future of "Indian Banking Industry" is safe.  The genius of the country will find its future bankers.  Let the old generation learn from the Post Master and quit worrying. Life goes on and on.........